Sawing & Wafers

The switch to diamond wire: what changed in wafer cutting

Sawing & Wafers · Published 2026-10-22

Two gloved workers hold a length of diamond wire with threaded diamond beads, a coil of wire beside them
Diamond wire from marble quarrying, with diamond beads threaded on a steel rope. Wafering wire is far finer, but the principle of a fixed abrasive is the same. Photo: Peter Tzeferis, CC BY-SA 4.0

In diamond wire sawing the cutting grain no longer floats loose in a glycol slurry; it is fixed to the wire. That apparently small difference reshaped machines, consumables, wafer surfaces and the whole circular economy around wafer cutting.

What a diamond wire is

A diamond wire has a thin, high-strength steel core with diamond grains held by a bond, often electroplated nickel, or by resin. The grains protrude from the bond and scratch the silicon. Unlike in the slurry process, the wire carries the tool itself; the liquid is only there to cool, lubricate and remove debris.

A Fraunhofer THM conference paper gives core diameters of 60 to 70 µm for diamond wires and highlights short process times and the use of water with about 2 % additives as a cheap coolant (Kaden et al., 35th EU PVSEC, 2018). A 2025 review describes the trend to even finer wires below 35 µm, which wear faster and break more often (Ge et al., Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 203, 2026).

Slurry versus diamond wire

AspectSlurry processDiamond wire
AbrasiveLoose SiC grains in PEGDiamond, fixed to the wire
Wire diameter (examples from the sources)180 µm (classic), 115 µm (structured)60–70 µm core (2018), trend below 35 µm
LiquidHigh-viscosity glycolWater with a few per cent additives
RemovalRolling, indentingScratching
Sub-surface damageReferenceAbout half as deep (per UNSW)
Waste streamSiC-glycol slurry with silicon and ironAqueous suspension with silicon, little foreign grit

Sources: PV Manufacturing (UNSW); Kaden et al. 2018; Ge et al. 2026.

Why the industry switched

According to the UNSW teaching platform, equipment and wire are more expensive for diamond wire sawing, but total cost of ownership is much lower; the advantages it lists are faster cutting, the possibility of recycling silicon, and much lower kerf loss (PV Manufacturing, "Wafering"). Photovoltaics then switched entirely, first for monocrystalline and later for multicrystalline silicon.

How fast that went shows in older forecasts: the 2016 edition of the International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV) still expected diamond wire to take around ten years to reach a market share of about 60 % for multicrystalline silicon (TaiyangNews on ITRPV 2016). The change came much faster.

Consequences for the wafer surface

A scratching grain leaves a different surface from a rolling one. Diamond-sawn wafers show fine scratch lines and areas of ductile-mode removal; slurry-sawn wafers have a more uniformly pitted surface. That matters because the surface is then textured to reduce reflection.

Consequences for consumables and recycling

Less SiC, less glycol

With diamond wire, photovoltaics no longer consumes large amounts of SiC grit and glycol. The market for SiC-glycol slurry reprocessing shrank where it had been biggest. Slurry processes remain where they have technical advantages; the 2018 Fraunhofer paper notes that slurry processes still held a high share in microelectronics.

A new waste stream

Instead, an aqueous suspension of coolant and very fine silicon kerf is produced. It contains little foreign grit but some metal from the wire bond. Yang and co-authors write that recycling and reuse of kerf silicon became more realistic with diamond wire because of the lower contamination (Waste Management 84, 2019). More in kerf loss and silicon recovery.

Hydrogen as a safety issue

Water-based coolants have a drawback: freshly exposed silicon reacts with water and releases hydrogen. A patent application on wire-sawing fluids calls the hydrogen a possible explosion hazard in production and notes that gas bubbles disturb the distribution of fluid on the wire web; it proposes additives that suppress hydrogen formation (US 2011/0240002 A1). Another application describes glycol additives that form a protective film to slow hydrogen formation (WO 2014/086024 A1). For a plant, this feeds directly into explosion-protection zoning and ventilation design.

Remaining challenges